Skip to content
All case studies
BeerLatin AmericaHot End Audit + Management Audit

LATAM beer plant — 6 OEE points + 80% cross-shift variance collapse

7 min · written by Lean Glass

Client profile

Latin American beer glass producer — 1 furnace, 5 forming lines, ~420 TPD, supplying domestic beer market plus regional export. Anonymised under NDA.

The problem

Baseline OEE of 72%. Cross-shift variance on Line 3 (the highest-volume line) of 18 percentage points between best and worst shift. Pack-to-melt at 81%. Persistent settle-wave defect mode that the forming team had been chasing for 9 months without resolution. The plant had been told by an OEM-tied consultancy that the path forward was a $4.2M mould-cooling capex programme.

What we found

The settle-wave defect was a forehearth issue, not a forming issue — riser air imbalance at zones 3 and 5 on Line 3 was the root cause. The cross-shift variance traced to absent Leader Standard Work: no daily KPI huddle, no documented escalation paths, defect closure rate at 27%. The mould-cooling capex was unnecessary; the operational findings would deliver more.

What we did

Hot end audit week 1–2; findings workshop week 3. Re-tuned forehearth riser air across all 5 lines (zero capex, 4 days of work). Installed daily T1/T2/T3 huddle cadence and Leader Standard Work for shift leader, supervisor, hot-end superintendent and plant manager. Built KPI ownership matrix and escalation register. Coached for 8 weeks; internal coaches led the final 4 weeks.

The numbers

OEE (plant average)
72%78%
+6 pts
Pack-to-melt
81%85%
+4 pts
Cross-shift variance (Line 3)
18 pts3.5 pts
−80%
Settle-wave defect rate
2.1%0.3%
−85%
Defect closure rate
27%92%
+65 pts
Capex required
$4.2M (proposed)$0
deferred
EBITDA impact

$8.7M annualised EBITDA recovery, plus $4.2M deferred capex.

"We had six spreadsheets reporting OEE differently. Now we have one dashboard and the debate is about what to fix, not whose number is right. And we didn't need the $4.2M capex."
Plant Director, LATAM beer glass producer

Timeline

Days 1–2: pre-engagement data review. Week 1: on-site audit. Week 2–3: findings + workshop. Weeks 4–6: forehearth re-tune + standard work install. Weeks 7–14: coaching cadence + internal coach handoff.

Verifiable on request.

Anonymised under NDA. Specific plants, customers and KPIs verifiable in confidential discussion under mutual NDA.

30-minute call with a senior practitioner.

Bring a problem — leave with a direction.